Posts Tagged ‘Product Recall’

CPSC Fines Children’s Product Importer $2 Million and Prohibits Its U.S. Sales

Wednesday, March 3rd, 2010

Recalled Wooden Toy Imported by Daiso

Toy and children’s product importer, Daiso, was issued a $2 million fine and cannot import or sell children’s products in the United States until the company meets a long list of safety requirements set out in a decree issued yesterday. The company had five recalls since 2008 and imported illegal products that the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) examined and stopped at the ports before they could be sold.

“This landmark agreement for an injunction sets a precedent for any firm attempting to distribute hazardous products to our nation’s children” said CPSC Chairman Inez Tenenbaum. “We are committed to the safety of children’s products and we will use the full force of our enforcement powers to prevent the sale of harmful products.”

Toys”R”Us Offers Discount for Turning in Old, Unsafe Baby Products

Thursday, February 4th, 2010

Image of a Recalled Play Yard

Unsafe and recalled children’s products are, unfortunately, a big problem for today’s parents.  WeMakeItSafer research estimates that 214 million potentially dangerous children’s products have been recalled and remain in circulation and could be in use currently.  (See the Children’s Products Recall Report for more recall statistics.)  To offer parents some relief, from now until February 20, Toys”R”Us, Inc. is promoting its “Great Trade-In” event to help replace unsafe baby products with new ones.

Bring used baby products to Babies”R”Us and Toys”R”Us locations nationwide and, in exchange, get 25% savings on the purchase of a new item from select manufacturers.  Toys”R”Us, Inc. spokeswoman Katie Reczek said the company disposes of the used items it receives.  This ensures that products cannot be put back into circulation.  Toys”R”Us consulted with product safety organizations, who gave the company this advice regarding disposal.

Stores are accepting these used items:

  • Cribs
  • Car seats
  • Bassinets
  • Strollers
  • Travel systems
  • Play yards
  • High chairs
  • Toddler beds

Because all used items are going to be destroyed, Toys”R”Us is not prepared to help you determine if your used item has been recalled. With each recall, however, various remedies are provided.  Use our Product Recall Search to find photos of recalled products and search easily by the brand name of the product you own.  Our recall product page will tell you, for example, whether you should contact the company for a free repair kit or whether you could return it to the store where you bought it.

More Pacifiers Added to Recall List

Friday, November 20th, 2009

Recalled Bobby Chupete Pacifiers

Sixth Pacifier Failed to Meet Federal Safety Standards This Year

Today, the CPSC announced a recall of “Bobby Chupete” pacifiers because of a potential choking hazard.  According to the CPSC, over 600,000 of these pacifiers were imported by Grand World Inc.  Although no connection is mentioned in the recall announcement, very similar pacifiers sold under the name, “My Baby Soother,”  were recalled last month, also due to a choking hazard.   The My Baby Soother version was distributed by T & L Trading.

In the My Baby Soother recall, the CPSC stated that “T & L Trading has refused to recall these pacifiers,” and therefore issued the warning itself, urging distributors and retailers who purchased the “My Baby Soother” pacifiers from T & L Trading to call the agency.   There were 16,500 pacifiers included in the T & L trading recall.

As we try to piece this together, several questions come to mind:

  • Who manufactured the pacifiers? Is it the same entity in both recalls?
  • Was T & L Trading also an importer, or did it purchase pacifiers from Grand World Inc.?
  • Are there more distributors, more importers?
  • How many units did the manufacturer(s) make?

The CPSC is surely investigating this matter, and we will keep you posted as we learn more.

In addition to these two recalls, consumers should review the photos of other recent pacifier recalls.  There have been four other pacifier recalls in 2009 alone.  In January, 38,000 flashing pacifiers were recalled.  Although marketed as a toy for older children, if mistakenly given to an infant or toddler, the pacifier could cause serious injury or death.   In April, about 40,000 pacifiers imported by Healthtex were recalled.  These Zoo pacifiers have animal cartoon figures as handles.  In July, about 700 Jaloma pacifiers were sold in the New York and New Jersey area and were recalled because they have a mouth guard and ventilation holes that are too small.

One pacifier recalled in March under the Baby Necessities brand involved about 2,900 pacifiers.  Subsequently, the Los Angeles importer, OKK Trading, agreed to pay $665,000 in a provisional penalty settlement that resolved previous import and export violations, many of which resulted in recalls, but does not appear to cover this most recent pacifier recall.  In the settlement, the CPSC alleged that OKK Trading knowingly imported and sold pacifiers, which violated the prohibition on small parts and and various other children’s toys, rattles and games that were in violation of numerous federal standards including lead paint limits.

Check to make sure pacifiers you own have not been recalled at WeMakeItSafer.com. Then, sign up for WeMakeItSafer’s e-newsletter by sending an email to InformMe@WeMakeItSafer.com. Twice a month, you will receive images of recent recalls in your inbox.   A quick glance will ensure you remain aware and your family stays safe.


More Deaths Prompt Expanded Recall of Blair’s Chenille Clothing

Sunday, November 1st, 2009

061109 Blair Robe

Check your closet and make sure your parents and grandparents check as well.  Blair LLC and CPSC expanded the earlier robe recall to include additional chenille garments, including jackets and sweaters.  Blair has received several reports of the chenille garments catching fire, including nine deaths, most of which involved seniors who were cooking at the time.

2009-11-01 Blair top

See all images for this recall.

With the recall expansion, about 300,000 articles of clothing have been recalled. All four of the clothing items were sold for $20 to $40.




More Window Coverings Recalled for Strangulation Risk to Children

Thursday, October 29th, 2009

2009-10-29 blinds_METhree recalls of window coverings were announced Tuesday, Oct. 27, because entanglement in the cords could result in the strangulation of a child. There have been over 10 similar recalls
in 2009. See images for all the recent recalls of blinds, shades and
cords.

Parents and caregivers should be very cautious about the loops and cords
that accompany window coverings. Check that the coverings and cords are
properly installed and attached to the wall at appropriate heights. Beaded
looped chains  and other cords should not hang loosely against the wall.
In one incident, a
2-year-old boy climbed up on a toy chest to look out of a window and became
entangled in the inner cords of the roman shade. Luckily his parents removed
the cord and no permanent injuries were sustained.

The most recent recalls were for:

Be sure to use WeMakeItSafer’s recall search tool to check your window coverings for recalls.


Will iPhones be Recalled by the CPSC Due to Overheating Batteries?

Friday, August 14th, 2009

New reports were released today regarding instances of iPhones overheating and exploding.  The reports highlight Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) documents that include at least 15 reports of incidents with iPods and iPhones.

I am not a battery expert, nor have I seen the CPSC documents related to the iPhone and iPod incidents; however, based on my research of lithium batteries when looking into remote control helicopter recalls, I would not be surprised if it turns out that the iPhones and iPods in question had been dropped at some point, either during manufacture, shipping or use. 

Lithium batteries, while lighter and able to pack more power into a smaller package compared to nickel-cadmium, are unstable and require special mechanisms to function properly. Should those mechanisms be disturbed, overheating, which can lead to fire and explosion, may ensue.  Here are some of the facts:

•  Lithium-ion is fragile and requires a protection circuit to maintain safe operation.

•  The maximum charge and discharge current must be properly limited; overcharging is dangerous.

•  The battery will become more vulnerable to failure if subjected to impact, crush or high rate charging.

•  Lithium-ion Polymer, generally thought of as safer and more stable, is often compromised in commercial use to improve conductivity.

Although there are several other factors in the case of iPhones that could be causing issues, such as overworked processors, looking back on the numerous lithium battery operated products that have been recalled over the past several years, I again find myself questioning the safety of this power source in certain products.  U.S. manufacturers and importers announced more than 30 lithium battery related recalls during the five year period from 2004 through 2008, involving nearly 14 million product units.  While most recalls involved computer batteries, products ranging from bicycle lights to toys experienced problems. As a side note, it will be interesting to watch the safety reports of the many new lithium-ion powered cars.

With regard to CPSC documents that identify reports of iPhone failure, anyone can request such documents under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), but companies are afforded intellectual property protection.  Therefore, if a company claims that documents expose proprietary technology or trade secrets, the documents will not be released.  However, if it is true that KIRO-TV received documents from the CPSC as noted in the above referenced report, one could simply ask to see a copy of the documents already provided to the news station.  There may be a fee associated with the physical copying or scanning, but the time to receive the documents should be less than the seven months reported by KIRO now that the documents already have been produced. Here is where to request the information:  http://www.cpsc.gov/library/foia/foiaonline.html

Interestingly, because of new rules imposed by the Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act of 2008 (CPSIA), consumers soon may be able to find this type of information online.  Sec. 212 of the CPSIA mandates that, "subject to the availability of appropriations," the CPSC must create an online searchable database of incident reports; information that currently must be formally requested under FOIA.  Companies will still have an opportunity to claim intellectual property rights (though less likely to stick given that the information will be coming from consumers) and will be allowed to provide comments to be published alongside the reports.  The database is scheduled to come online by August 14, 2010.

As for iPhone, regardless of what is in the CPSC documents, Apple has taken the possibility of dangerous overheating seriously enough to release an update that includes a temperature warning screen, though the temperatures are so extreme (less that 0 degrees F and greater than 113 degrees F) that most will never see the warning.

It may be too early to say whether the CPSC will require Apple to issue a recall related to iPhones.  Nevertheless, as a practical matter, in addition to watching the ambient temperatures and heeding warning screens, if you drop your iPhone or iPod – or any other lithium battery operated device for that matter – consider replacing the battery, especially if you notice unexplained changes in charge cycles.

Here’s some general information from Apple on their lithium batteries:
http://www.apple.com/batteries/ 

And, here is some research on the pros and cons of lithium batteries:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lithium-ion_battery
http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/upgrade/4204202.html
http://electronics.howstuffworks.com/lithium-ion-battery.htm


Return Blair Catalog Robes Immediately – Six Deaths Reported

Thursday, June 11th, 2009

061109 Blair Robe In April 2009, Blair, LLC announced a recall of certain women's, 100% cotton robes sold between January 2003 and March 2009 due to failure to meet federal flammability requirements.  At the time of the recall, Blair had received three reports of robes catching fire, with one of the incidents resulting in second-degree burns.

Since the recall announcement, Blair has received six reports of death due to the robes catching fire.

The recalled robes have a button front, long sleeves, a straight bottom and two pockets. The robe’s label states: “100% Cotton, RN 81700, Made in Pakistan”.   The following item numbers are included in the recall and can be found on the label at the robe's neckline:

  • 3093111
  • 3093112
  • 3093113
  • 3093114
  • 3093115
  • 3093116

The photo above may not accurately portray every recalled robe. If you ever purchased a Blair robe, if you cannot remember where you purchased your robe, or if you received a robe as a gift in the last seven years, WeMakeItSafer urges you to check your robe against the above description.  Please also check the robes of your senior friends and family; three of the six deaths were of senior citizens.

Although the robes were sold for $20 -$40, Blair is offering a choice
of refund or $50 merchandise certificate for return of the robes.  Contact Blair toll-free at (877) 392-7095 between 9 a.m. and 9 p.m. ET Monday through Saturday, visit the firm’s Web site at www.blair.com/recall, or contact the firm by e-mail at blairproductrecall@blair.com

Please help spread the word on this very important information.  The link to this post is: http://blog.wemakeitsafer.com/jennifer/2009/06/return-recalled-robes.html

More information:

CPSC Announcement
Blair document citing efforts to retrieve recalled products



1.6 Million Refrigerators Recalled due to Fire Hazard – Check Your Model

Wednesday, March 11th, 2009

Images of refrigerators recalled for fire hazard.
I have not covered many recalls lately but felt the need to get the word out on this one as 41 reports have already been received regarding refrigerator components igniting.   The recalled refrigerators were manufactured by Maytag, but are sold under a number of brands, styles and colors, so be sure to check your serial number and model.

Brands affected include: 

Admiral
Amana
Crosley
Jenn-Air
Magic Chef
Maytag
Performa by Maytag

If you are not sure whether your refrigerator is one of these brands, go ahead and
do a quick check against the numbers below anyway, just to be safe.

Maytag refergerator recall model number list

If you discover that you do own one of the models listed above, contact Maytag immediately for a free in-home repair.  Toll Free (866) 533-9817.

Full recall announcement here.

Safety Matters in the New Year

Thursday, January 1st, 2009
Happy New Year


Happy
New Year! I hope that everyone enjoyed
time with their friends and family over the holiday season and trust that the New
Year finds you well and ready to take on the new and growing challenges of our
day. 2009 brings with it a long list of obstacles,
but also an enormous opportunity for change.
So, in the words of Reinhold Niebuhr, “
God,
give us grace to accept with serenity the things that cannot be changed,
courage to change the things that should be changed, and the wisdom to
distinguish the one from the other.”


Included among those things we can and should change
is improving our systems and practices surrounding product safety matters. Writing laws such as those imposed by the
Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act of 2008 (CPSIA) is only one piece. The Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) must now execute. And while the commission and its staff have
their work cut out for them for sure, the toughest road will be traveled by the
manufacturers, importers and retailers who must now obey these new laws.

In
that light, my plan for this blog in 2009 is to provide information that will
help you keep your family safer, and information to help your company keep its customers safer. By presenting various resources, tools and
analyses, I hope to make complying with the CPSIA a bit easier and, should a
product recall become necessary, make realizing a successful outcome possible.

For
the past several years, we have been gathering data and analyzing every detail
related to product recalls. We are now preparing
to publishing our initial reports outlining some very interesting recall statistics. From the number of recalls occurring for each
product type and trends in country of manufacture, to the average cost of
recalling a product and the impact on a company’s stock price, if it is related
to consumer product recalls and it is quantifiable (and sometimes even if it’s
not), we have studied it. Please check
back often, as we will release reports as they become available and may offer
them here, on the blog, if the WeMakeItSafer.com site has not yet launched.

Welcome,
2009. Here’s to a great year to come.

More Information About the CPSIA Please

Monday, November 3rd, 2008

If you have been
following this blog since its inception, you have noticed a mix of topics, from
research regarding the financial impact of recalls on manufacturers to safety tips for consumers.  The reason?  A mix of readers.  Much to my delight, this blog is read by
consumers, manufacturers, retailers, academics and researchers. 

After several posts with an academic bent,
consumers began asking for more practical advice related to product safety and
recalls.  Hence, posts like those on bike safety and Halloween recallsMore recently, I have been
getting requests for more information about the CPSIA.  To oblige this latest request, I am currently
working on a series of posts that will more thoroughly address the differences
between the Consumer Product Safety Act (1972 CPSA) and the Consumer
Product Safety Improvement Act (2008 CPSIA), a topic which I briefly addressed here
and here.  I will also continue to pepper
the blog with posts more directly applicable to consumers. 

The best way to make sure your topic of
interest is covered is to simply email me with your questions and ideas.  I can be reached at:  

Jennifer [at] WeMakeItSafer.com

Thank you to everyone who has been following the blog, and a special thanks to those who have already emailed me with questions and ideas for future posts. Your thoughts are greatly appreciated.